www.DemocraticFundamentalism.org - reclaiming fundamental democratic constitutional values
www.DemocraticFundamentalism.org


Dr. Steven Hatfill and the Anthrax Attacks
Pat Clawson has volunteered to be spokesman on behalf of his friend

"He Didn't Do It!"

Is it time for the FBI to move on?


One of the problems with the press.  and I'll include this website as part of that for this discussion... is that you can only report on the information provided.  As John Stossel reported on ABC's 20/20 regarding the appearance of more shark attacks... news is often recycled, from reporter to reporter, and creates the appearance of a bigger headline than actually exists.

There are times when it perpetrates a lie.  And this may easily be the case of Dr. Steven Hatfill.

And when I compare his service to this country, and his obvious intelligence... as well as comparing his remarks to my own experiences with surveillance and phone taps and obstruction of my email and other services... I have to believe that, in fact, Mr. Hatfill is innocent.

I've taken this space to highlight this because in some ways, I feel responsible for having caused the most recent and most visible coverage and investigation of Mr. Hatfill.   At this point, he, and you, may consider this a retraction.   My original intent was to force the administration to persue action in the anthrax case... which they did... but maybe it's time for the FBI to move on with the investigation, to other suspects.

This is Mr. Hatfill's most recent statement, from CNN. Go here for the complete story.

ALEXANDRIA, Virginia (CNN) -- Former Army biomedical researcher Steven Hatfill declared Sunday he had nothing to do with last fall's anthrax attacks and accused the FBI of hounding him and his girlfriend in order to give the appearance that it was making progress in the investigation.

"I want to look my fellow Americans directly in the eye and declare to them, 'I am not the anthrax killer; I know nothing about the anthrax attacks; I had nothing to do with this terrible crime,'" he told reporters outside his lawyer's office.

Hatfill's lawyer, Victor Glasberg, said he has filed a complaint against Attorney General John Ashcroft for referring to Hatfill as a "person of interest" in the investigation of anthrax attacks that killed five people.

The 48-year-old doctor said, "My life is being destroyed by arrogant government bureaucrats who are peddling groundless innuendo and half information."

Hatfill said Ashcroft's characterization of the scientist as a "person of interest" was unfair.

"In my view, he has broken the ninth commandment: thou shall not bear false witness," Hatfill added, his voice shaking with emotion.

"This assassination of my character appears to be part of a government effort to show the American people that it is proceeding vigorously and successfully with the anthrax investigation," he said.

Hatfill also lambasted the Justice Department for leaking details of his background to the news media, which has resulted in his life being "picked apart by journalists looking for a hot story."

The move is self-serving, and wrong, he said: "The FBI can be seen to be on the job, the press is hot on the trail and the public is satisfied ... that progress in the anthrax letter attacks is being made."

Hatfill also criticized Nicholas Kristof, a New York Times columnist, who referred to the scientist as "Mr. Z" and criticized the FBI for not pursuing him more aggressively.

Hatfill said he has taken one polygraph since January, and was told he had passed it. In his column, Kristof said Hatfill had taken and failed three of the tests.

"Mr. Kristof, why did you not at least check the facts?" Hatfill asked. "Why did you permit yourself to be used as a vehicle to leak?"

Hatfill said the newspaper refused to publish his response to the column. The New York Times had no comment.

Not only has his life been turned upside down by Ashcroft's reference to him as a "person of interest," but his girlfriend's life and apartment have also been upset, Hatfill said.

"She was screamed at by FBI agents and told that the FBI had firm evidence that I had killed five innocent people," Hatfill said. He displayed pictures of his girlfriend's apartment he said had been taken after it was "ransacked" by the FBI. The pictures showed boxes ripped apart.

"This is the life of a 'person of interest,' Mr. Ashcroft."

The FBI also had no comment.

Hatfill predicted he will eventually face charges, but not for the anthrax killings.

Hatfill predicted the feds will unearth trivial charges: "Well, he spit on a government sidewalk or littered on a government building somewhere."

Despite the problems he has faced from investigators, Hatfill said he has been buoyed by support from family, friends and strangers.

Glasberg filed his complaint with the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility last week.

In a letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, Hatfill's lawyer said the FBI has "violated elementary rules of fairness and decency."

He also objected to the FBI's "in-your-face 'surveillance' that turns into harassment."

Investigators have turned up no physical evidence linking Hatfill to the anthrax attacks, according to federal sources, and say they don't consider him a suspect in the case.

Hatfill is one of at least 20 persons considered "of interest" to investigators, sources have told CNN.

His name came to national prominence when two searches of his home were televised nationally after news media were tipped.

The complaint against Ashcroft escalates Hatfill's public campaign for vindication. He told reporters two weeks ago that he had nothing to do with the attacks, had never worked with anthrax and had been told by the FBI that he had passed a polygraph test and was not a suspect.



Be a NEW PATRIOT.   Do it for America.  Do it for yourself.  Click here for more!

Webnotes:   Info on updates & tech issues

(c) 2001,2002  DemocraticFundamentalism.org    Contact us


(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this/some material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)